grapevine: hear.it.first

Posts Tagged ‘wine’

Dinner with Your Boss

Friday, April 17th, 2009

by Mike Supple
published: 07 Jul 2008

Don’t let so many choices daunt you.

You got invited to your boss’s house for dinner. Congratulations; you’re probably not going to get fired. Why not continue your good fortune by impressing your boss and taking some pressure off of the dinner? Bringing the right bottle of wine will help create a relaxed setting and show that you care about making a good impression on somebody who obviously already thinks highly of you.

Here’s the problem: your boss may know more about wine than you or, worse yet, just thinks he does. You need to bring a bottle that you can feel confident about, impresses someone who knows about wine, doesn’t ostracize someone who doesn’t know much about wine and doesn’t break the bank. The good news is you’re in luck. A few simple tips will make you look like the genius you already know you are.

  1. Avoid white wines. Don’t get me wrong, some of the best wines in the world are white. However, whites are very difficult to bring to a dinner. The first reason is because they have to be chilled, and you don’t want to show up somewhere and make your host do extra work just because you’re there. The second is that people tend to have stronger feelings about white wines than red. They either love them or hate them, and you don’t want to get stuck on the wrong side of a Cabernet drinker by brining a big buttery California Chardonnay.
  2. Avoid names you recognize but have never tried on any wine under $20. If you recognize it from anything other than personal experience it, probably means that it’s a bulk production wine and they spend a lot of money on advertising. This doesn’t inherently mean the wine isn’t worth drinking, it just means that your boss may see it that way.
  3. Choose a variety you like. If you have a particular favorite variety of wine, choose something from that category (Syrah for example). There are thousands of great wines out there, so half the battle of impressing somebody with your selection is you feeling confident about it. If you like it, don’t be afraid to be assertive; your confidence will catch on and other people will enjoy the bottle.
  4. Go Southern Hemisphere. When it comes to value, the best wines for your dollar are consistently come from the Southern Hemisphere: Chile, Argentina and Australia all produce great wines for less money (but make sure you stick to rule #2, particularly when buying from Australia).
  5. Buy medium-bodied wines. Especially if you don’t know what you will be eating, stick with wines that are medium-bodied and will go with a larger variety of foods. This means: Pinot Noir, Malbec, Tempranillo, Chianti (the Sangiovese grape) or Merlot (although thanks to the movie “Sideways” your boss may think Merlot is not good, which is utter crap).
  6. Buy a book by its cover. Seriously. If a wine label draws your eye, it will draw your boss’s eye too. Don’t go for the garish one with the stripper (yes, this winery actually exists) but something bright and classy will work.
  7. Read the labels. Take three minutes to read the front and back labels of the bottle you picked up. More wineries are hiring marketing specialists and starting to put helpful information on the bottles, which is a nice bonus for you. This will give you something to say when your boss asks you why you chose this particular bottle other than, “It was $17 and that’s what I had left after I got gas and a Red Bull.” Don’t be the idiot who just memorizes the quote on the back, “The cool morning fog coming off the Sonoma Coast gives the grapes a longer ripening time, bringing out more flavors of blueberry and forest floor.” Instead, note a couple of key phrases and state them your own way. When you give your boss the bottle say, “I like the cooler Sonoma Coast wines and I thought you would enjoy this one.”

I’m listing a few wines below that make great selections, but due to the fact that wines are made in limited quantities, finding a specific bottle at your local shop can be difficult. We’ve paired up with a great site based in Australia that will show you local stores worldwide that carry the wines. To see if there’s one near you just click on the name of the wine. Remember that confidence when presenting your wine is key, so if you follow these tips and pick a wine, feel good about it and enjoy.

2006 Pillar Box Red, Australia - $12
This is a blend of a few different red grapes, mostly Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon. Very spicy, rich and jammy, and tastes like a much more expensive bottle. Note: it is in a screw cap.

2006 Don Rodolfo Vina Cornejo Costas Malbec, Argentina - $15
Normally Malbec is a bold and powerful wine, but this one comes from a cooler region that gives it more subtle spices. This makes it better for easy drinking with a variety of foods.

2005 Green Lion Cabernet Sauvignon, California - $19
One of the best values coming out of Napa, hands down. Ready to drink and very high quality. The label was designed by Alan Aldridge who has done album covers for The Rolling Stones, the Beatles, Elton John, Jimmy Hendrix and Pink Floyd.

2005 Domaine Vieux Lazaret Chateauneuf du Pape, France - $25
A blend of several red grapes, mostly Grenache and Syrah. 2005 was a stellar vintage for Chateauneuf du Pape, and this wine is as good as many for twice the price.

2005 Querciabella Chianti Classico, Italy - $25
A solid producer and a great year for Chianti. This wine has really great spicy smells and flavors. And if your boss is into saving the earth, it’s Biodynamic (although it does not say it on the label).

Forget Corkage, Can I Bring My Own Glass?

Friday, April 17th, 2009

by Mike Supple
published: 04 Oct 2007

The wine I wanted to order from the list was the 1983 Chateau Margaux. While 1982 may be the landmark vintage that pops into mind, my interests lay elsewhere for dinner. I had recently been in Bordeaux again, and during a meeting with Paul Pontallier I was reminded of the stunning beauty of the 1983 Margaux. The weather treated the Cabernet Sauvignon well, and the fully ripe grapes produced a wine of monstrous depth, complexity and tannin that truly did not begin to shed its tannic youth until a few years ago. Now the true elegance of a well aged Margaux is beginning to come forward.

The restaurant is small and privately owned since the mid-1970s, and supports a wine list maintained by Frank, the quirky owner. The majority of the list pays homage to the current trends and popular bulk wineries: a solid core of Chardonnay, both heavily oaked and completely unoaked; a diminishing list of poorly constructed Merlots; a growing list of (poorly constructed) Pinot Noirs; and Zinfandel, a California staple. The hidden gems were towards the back of the list. These were all wines that Frank had purchased upon release and then squirreled away in his private collection, only to be forgotten. As he grew older his tastes turned towards the bolder, richer, fruitier New World style of winemaking, and his veritable bevy of aged Bordeaux, Burgundies, Barolos and more made their way to the wine list.

Contrary to the general trend, Frank decided that since he had purchased these wines for a song, it would only be right to pass them on to his customers in the same form. And this is where I come in to play. The low prices smeared on the pages as I drooled at things I could only hope to find in retail shops. My mind made up, I ordered the ‘83 Margaux, and asked our waiter if they had any glassware besides the clunky goblets on the table. He spun away to find something, and I was left to peruse the delicacies on the menu while daydreaming of a dark ruby glass exploding with rich plums and cassis.

The seconds became minutes, but I was not left alone with my thoughts for long. Frank, the star of the show, came banging over to the table in his wheelchair, deftly keeping every drop of Zinfandel in his glass. After taking a large swig and signaling to the hostess for a refill, he began to expound upon painstaking care with which he chose the ingredients going in to each of the dishes I was bound to enjoy that evening. He eventually rolled off to greet another table, and again I was left to my thoughts and beginning to worry about the well being of my absent waiter.

Some time later, the man in question reappeared carrying glasses that almost, but not quite, resembled something I would risk filling with expensive wine. As he sheepishly presented them, he said, “This is the only crystal in the restaurant…they were left here from a recent wedding.” Suddenly the strange etchings made sense as the words “Donna & Phil” came in to focus.

I never believed it until I went through a Riedel glass seminar, but the proper glass makes a world of difference to the wine. Riedel has spent generations researching how differences in shape affect the aromatics of wine and influence accurate placement of the wine onto the tongue. Not wanting to do the Margaux the disservice of anything less than full enjoyment I declined the offer and switched my order to a bottle of the 1995 Taittinger Comtes de Champagnes. Their champagne flutes were in much better condition than the other glassware, and I am of the firm belief that the proper occasion to drink Champagne is any one during which I am thirsty.

After a hearty meal of meats seasoned to match the power and fury of a ripe Zinfandel, I asked Frank to do me to favor of selling me the bottle of ‘83 Margaux, which he good-naturedly placed in a doggy bag and sent me on my way.

As I now sit and swirl the wine in my Riedel, it is everything I had hoped it would be. But it also makes me think of Frank and what other hidden treasures are lurking in the bowels of his restaurant. Next time I’m bringing my own stemware.

Burgundy’s Dirty Little Secret

Friday, April 17th, 2009

by Mike Supple
published: 04 Oct 2007

Looking across Romanee Conti and La Romanee Vineyards

It’s a common scene: an impatient silence temporarily falls over what was just a lively, chatty room. Butterflies of anticipation flutter in stomachs as the host reveals the wines for the evening. Perhaps a 1983 Dom Perignon, a 1962 DRC La Tâche, a 1947 Petrus, and a 1967 Chateau d’Yquem. This is sure to be a memorable evening, if not a landmark one. But where is the creativity, the flair, the panache? Picking these wines requires no knowledge of the drink; just go to one of the popular critics’ web sites and search for wines by rating, then drop the appropriate sum with a high-end retailer.

Getting better wine for less money; this is what the game is all about.

The cat is out of the bag. Arguably 2005 is one of the best vintages Burgundy has seen. Laurence Jobard, oenologist for Maison Joseph Drouhin for 33 years, believes that the 2005 is the best vintage she has ever made, and I am hard pressed to find any winemaker who disagrees with her. The critics have all weighed in, and while there may be some bickering as to which individual wine takes the crown, the vintage is a screaming success. This news is both pleasurable and discouraging to Burgundy collectors, because increased hype around a vintage drives the market prices up and squeezes availability on these already hard-to-find wines.

Everybody I talk to has a different opinion. There are those who have never tried Burgundy but feel this is the time to buy everything they can get their hands on; other seasoned collectors stay the course and stick by their allocations from the same trusted producers year in and year out; still more lament the outlandish increase in prices and choose to leave a gap in their running verticals. The choice is up to the individual, but some of the 2005 red Burgundies I have tried are among the most stunning young wines I have yet to encounter. The key word in that sentence is “red”.

So what choice remains? Buy the wines from “off” vintages? In a manner of speaking, yes. Here is the dirty secret: the reputation of a vintage in Burgundy lives and dies by the Pinot Noir. This has led to the tragic overlooking of some of the most stunning white wines ever made, and this must end!

Sure, Chardonnay is grown almost everywhere in the world, but to date no other wine region matches the crisp purity, richness of fruit, striking minerality and unparalleled ability to age as a well made white Burgundy. While perhaps austere and lean in the tough years, drinking the best wines can be a truly transcendent experience. The year 1973 rarely shows up in vintage charts of notable years in Burgundy, but the 1973 DRC Le Montrachet is widely regarded as their greatest Montrachet, and some critics argue that it is still a perfect wine even with 34 years of age on it.

In the shadow of the great 2005 vintage, most of the wines from 2006 will be overlooked. This is not necessarily a bad thing particularly with Pinot Noir, as many of the wines will be fruity but short-lived, but to skip the vintage completely will be a mistake (particularly with the Chardonnay). Yes, there was hail that destroyed some vines, and yes, rain before the harvest led to some rot. But that IS Burgundy! The best winemakers know how to adapt and work with what Mother Nature provides. Every winemaker I spoke with from up north in Chablis to the southern end of the Cote d’Or agrees: 2006 is an anomaly, and never have the Chardonnay grapes gotten so ripe while maintaining such high acidity. As Laurent Ponsot himself recently told me, “‘06 is more balanced…pH, alcohol, acidity…everything is just - perfect.” He did quickly add the caveat that 2006 was “vraiment une année de challenge” and that the greatest wines were made on the vine, not in the cellar. In the land of Bourgogne, the rule of terroir is king. Follow the great soils and you will find the greatest wines.

What does this all mean? Amidst the continuing challenge of trying to buy reasonably priced French wines with a bruised and battered American Dollar, look to white Burgundy. Try the vintages in between the ripe red fury. Drink some ripe, crisp 2004s and 2006s while they’re young and fruity, and put some in your cellar to experience the true beauty of pure aged Chardonnay. Or don’t, and leave them all for me!

How to Read a California Wine Label

Tuesday, February 10th, 2009



Mike Supple from SuppleWine.com goes through easy steps so you can read and recognize key information on a wine label for a Californian wine.

Transcript

Matt: Hi. I’m with Mike Supple of SuppleWine.com, and we’re here to talk about how to read labels. We’re starting with California.

Mike: Alright. So reading a label is something that’s fairly easy if you know what you’re doing. It’s also fairly important if you don’t know what you’re doing, so if your friend invites you over for dinner and says, ‘Hey, come over to my house; bring a bottle of Cabernet,’ you don’t just sort of sit on the other end of the phone going ‘duh…’. You want to be able to go into the store and kind of know what you’re doing. Maybe ask a few questions, but get yourself there.

Mike: So here’s a California wine label. Start out with an easy piece of information: they always have the name of the producer. This one here is Canyon Road. Second thing: the most popular style of wines in California are the varietal based wines, and that means what they say on the label is the main grape in there. This one right here: Cabernet Sauvignon. That means it’s at least 75% Cabernet Sauvignon. That’s a law in the United States; it’s got to be at least 75% to have that name on the front.

Matt: 0% beer though.

Mike: Yeah…at least in the US!

Mike: The important thing: they can put 25% of whatever else they want in there. It does have to be made from grapes, it has to be wine, but it can be anything else they want. It can be white grapes, it can be red grapes. Basically, the better producers are going to put in whatever they think makes it taste better. Some producers are going to use 100% Cabernet Sauvignon; some might think it tastes better with 10% Merlot - it might make it a little softer. But basically that’s what you’re looking for: the varietal name.

Mike: They’re also going to have a region on each label. This one just says California. That just means that the grapes came from anywhere in California. They didn’t go with a specific region that tastes like certain things. They can blend some grapes from Napa, from Sonoma, from the Central Coast.

Matt: Oakland?

Mike: They could blend some grapes from Oakland, San Francisco Bay. You never really know what’s going on in those ones.

Mike: What other pieces of info? They always tell you the alcohol by volume. That’s important because it’s really a tax thing. Certain levels of alcohol get different tax rates. So if it’s below 14% they call it “table wine” and it’s a lower tax bracket. Above that they call it “dessert wine” and it’s more expensive for tax purposes - not for you, but for the winery.

Matt: Alright, so that was California. Now we’re going to get a little more specific and go with something you know. We’re talking about Napa.

Mike: This is still a wine from California, but the information on the label is a little bit different. Again, you’re going to have the producer. The name of this producer is Trefethen, which happens to be one of my favorite Napa based wines, but that’s not important right now.

Mike: A few other things you might see on here: at the top, Estate Grown. That means that they actually own the vineyards and they grow the grapes that they use to make this wine. That other one we were looking at doesn’t say that, which means they could have bought the grapes from anybody. A lot of people do this. It doesn’t necessarily mean it’s bad if they buy the grapes. Some people have long-term contracts so they buy the same grapes from the same guy in the same place for 20, 30, 40 years, but when it’s estate grown it generally means since they own the vineyards they have a little more control over the entire process. It’s usually going to mean that it’s a little higher quality.

Matt: And probably more expensive as well.

Mike: Well, right. Every time they spend more money and there’s more quality, they bump the price up. Whether it’s better or not, the price goes up.

Mike: Again, you’re going to see the year the wine was made. This was made in 2004. This is also a Cabernet Sauvignon, which means it’s got to be at least 75% Cabernet. This particular wine blends, I believe, Merlot, a little Petite Verdot, maybe a little bit of Cabernet Franc in there. It says Estate Grown, which means they own the vineyards these other grapes are from, but it’s not necessarily all Cabernet Sauvignon. And they do this because they feel adding those grapes just gives it a little more complexity, a little more nuance, etc.

Mike: The other major difference here is that this says ‘Oak Knoll District of Napa Valley’. It doesn’t say California. That’s called an American Viticultural Area, or an AVA. These are designated regions in the United States where the government and the growers have decided that certain wines from these vineyards always have specific characteristics. And so they put that on [the label] - Oak Knoll District is an AVA within the Napa Valley. It’s something a little extra, a little more designated, so it generally means the quality is going to be a little bit higher than something that just says California, and it also means it’s going to be a little more expensive.

Matt: So basically what you’re telling us is that you start out with the state, then the larger region and then the AVA. The smaller it gets, the farther you go down the line, the more likely you are to have something very distinct. Also, as Mike told you, they can name the varietal on the label if there is 75% or more of the grape, but sometimes there’s nothing on that label at all.

Mike: That’s true. Again, the most popular styles of wines in the United States are varietals - they will tell you what the wine is on the label - but they don’t all. For example, this wine right here, the Inglenook Reunion. Now, you see: name of the producer, and 1986 when it was harvested. You see “estate bottled” which means they bottled it on their property where the winery is - they did the bottling themselves. Some people outsource bottling. It doesn’t say the name of the grapes though, it just says “Reunion” and a little trademark (they copyrighted that name). And it says underneath that “Red Table Wine” from Napa Valley. So this did come from Napa, a specific area within California, so it makes it a little bit more expensive, a little bit more nuanced with specific characteristics, but all they’re telling you is that it’s red wine. That’s all they have to tell you. They don’t have to tell you what’s in it. We do happen to know that this is a blend of Cabernet and a few other things. When a winery does something like this they’re trying to brand something, trying to build a name for themselves, so you think, “When I have this I’m not drinking Cabernet, I’m drinking Reunion”.

Mike: In a nutshell, that’s California. Oh, it also always says somewhere on the bottle how big the bottle is. A regular bottle size is 750ml, and it has to say that on the bottle. It can be in tiny letters, it can be on the front, it can be on the back, but it’s got to be on there somewhere. Not really important, but that’s on the label.

Matt: If you know how big the bottle is, you’ve got a good start.

Mike: That’s about it. That should get us through California, so get out there and drink some good wine.

Mike: Or beer.

California’s Wine Regions

Monday, February 9th, 2009

Brief History

The first vines were planted in San Diego, CA by Spanish missionaries in the late 1700s. Commercial winemaking began in the 1820s. The Gold Rush of 1849 brought vineyards closer to the Sierra Foothills so the miners wouldn’t have to travel as far to meet their daily needs. In the 1850s, Agostin Haraszthy brought around 300 different types of European varieties to California, leading to the birth of California’s modern wine industry.

As people sprawled around the San Francisco Bay area after the Gold Rush, vine plantings increased substantially, and Sonoma and Napa began to take off. While Europe suffered from phylloxera issues in the 1870s and 1880s, California wineries experienced a boom. People began spreading further and planting vineyards up and down the state.

Prohibition, not surprisingly, had a major impact on the California wine industry, and in the 1920s there was a decline in production. However, a few forward thinking wineries pushed through this period by selling bulk grapes and grape juice along with yeast and clear instructions not to mix the ingredients in a very precise manner or else wine would result. And some wineries just kept selling to churches, since church-sponsored drinking wasn’t evil.

Key Regions (North to South)

Mendocino - Known for Cabernet Sauvignon, Sauvignon Blanc, Petite Sirah and Zinfandel. Home to the smaller region of Anderson Valley where Chardonnay and Pinot Noir are grown to produce traditional method sparkling wines. The climate is similar in many ways to that of Champagne, and these are arguably among the best sparkling wines produced in the US.

Sonoma - One of California’s largest and most important wine regions, it rivals neighboring Napa in both fame and quality. A key region for Cabernet Sauvignon, Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, Sauvignon Blanc, and Zinfandel.

Napa - California’s most famous (and most expensive) wine-making region. The diversity in climate, soil and aspect in Napa creates ideal growing conditions for many grape varieties with international demand. Known primarliy for rich, full-bodied Cabernet Sauvignon, but also produces high quality Chardonnay, Merlot, Sauvignon Blanc, Syrah and Zinfandel.

Monterey - One of California’s driest regions, where many of the vineyards depend on irrigation from the underground Salinas River. Known for Chardonnay, Pinot Blanc, Pinot Noir and, to a lesser extent, Cabernet Sauvignon and Riesling.

San Luis Obispo - Home to one of the hottest (Paso Robles) and one of the coolest (Arroyo Grande Valley) AVAs in California. Known for Cabernet Sauvignon, Pinot Noir, Sauvignon Blanc, Syrah and Zinfandel.

Santa Barbara - The southernmost part of California’s Central Coast wine region. While the town itself has almost subtropical conditions, the vineyards along the Pacific Coast get so much fog that it is among the coolest wine regions in the state. Known for Chardonnay, Pinot Noir and Sauvignon Blanc, and to a lesser extent Cabernet Franc, Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot.

Types of Wines

The most prominent type of wine produced in California is the varietal wine, which is a table wine that lists a single variety of grape on the label. Aside from varietal wines, California produces just about every other type of wine available in the rest of the world; inexpensive bulk wines, sparkling wines, late-harvest wines and fortified wines.

It is important to note that in the US the type of wine is determined by alcohol content, and is used for tax purposes rather than a measure of quality. Any wine with alcoholic strength below 14% is considered a “table wine” and anything over 14% is a “dessert” wine. This means that many red wines produced in California are technically dessert wines even though they have no residual sugar in them. These bottles are not required to be labeled as dessert wines, as the majority of them (Cabernet Sauvignon, Pinot Noir, Syrah, Zinfandel) are dry table wines with no sugar. The government term for “dessert” wine is solely for taxation purposes, while when wine makers refer to dessert wines, they typically mean a sweeter wine.

Prominent Grape Varieties

Most of the wines produced in California are made of the popular international or European grape varieties, though small vineyards with unique and delicious varieties can be found scattered throughout the state.

The most common: Cabernet Sauvignon, Chardonnay, Gewurztraminer, Merlot, Pinot Gris/Grigio, Pinot Noir, Riesling, Sangiovese, Sauvignon Blanc, Syrah, Viognier and Zinfandel.

Climate

As everyone already knows, California is perfect, sunny and mild all the time. How they manage to get any wine made after a long day of surfing is anyone’s guess.

But the reality is that the climate in California is rather varied due to geographic influences. Fog created by offshore currents is a constant problem up and down the coastline, interfering with grapes’ ability to get enough sunlight to ripen. However, various pockets of land (as pictured in the map above) do get some ideal temperatures and conditions. Despite being close to cold and foggy San Francisco, Napa is protected by mountain ranges and is one of the warmest and driest regions in the state. Rainfall is somewhat regular, falling mostly in the winter months. Winter is relatively mild throughout the state, creating very small risk of severe cold damage to the vines.

Spring frosts are one of the largest climatic issues in California, as frost can kill young buds on the vine and ruin the upcoming crop. Many tools are used to either move cold pockets of air or shield the grapes from the frost. In Napa, giant fans such as those in the video above are commonly used for pushing cold air away from low areas.

Geography

The geography of California is very varied, so it is difficult to give a generic overview (particularly since the areas under vine run about 600 miles from north to south and another 135 miles east to west). The soil in California is made of many different things due to the coming together of the Pacific tectonic plate and the North American tectonic plate (the cause of all those lovely earthquakes).

In 1983 the federal government began setting legal boundaries for defined wine regions called American Viticultural Areas (AVAs). These AVAs can be used on labels, and vary from broad (California) to specific (Oak Knoll District - which is within the AVA of Napa, which is within the AVA of the North Coast, which is within the AVA of California). While AVAs are supposed to be set up in accordance with specific geographich conditions, they are largely based on political and commercial reasons. A prime example is within the AVA of Napa. The various soil types in Napa generally run in veins from north to south, so it would make sense for the smaller AVAs to follow these veins. However, most of the AVAs run east to west along town boundaries and winery property lines, crossing different soil types and different climatic conditions.

Viticulture and Wine Making

California is often at the forefront of vineyard management and winemaking technologies. The University of California at Davis is home to one of the world’s best research facilities, particularly when it comes to viticulture and oenology.

Wineries range from massive conglomerates pumping out millions of gallons to tiny boutique wineries producing a mere handful of cases each year. The vineyard techniques vary from the latest mechanical processes to harvesting by hand, and from massive chemical use to totally organic practices. And it is a mistake to assume that all large wineries use chemicals and all small ones do not.

Practices are similarly varied inside the wineries. Without centuries of tradition as a guiding principal, most wine makers follow a largely scientific approach taught at UC Davis, carefully measuring, monitoring and controlling the whole process of fermentation. Many others treat wine making as an art form and combine modern techniques with classical ones, innovating and learning every year.

Wine Bottle Sizes

Wednesday, February 4th, 2009

by Mike Supple

Wine comes in many different bottle sizes. Fortunately, these sizes are fairly uniform worldwide (largely due to US and EU government regulations). However, different world regions like to use different names for the various bottles. So next time you’re at a party and some guy is bragging about the Imperial of Champagne he drank, you can call him out on it. For this size bottle (6000ml), Champagne (the region) uses the much cooler name, Methuselah. Here’s a quick chart below for your reference.

The standard measurement worldwide is in milliliters (ml), and the “standard bottle” of wine is 750ml. This standard was set after decades of testing, when it was finally decided by Alexander the Great that 750ml was “the amount of wine needed by one man in one sitting to hear the voices of the gods.” (I am, of course, lying to you. Everyone knows Alexander the Great preferred Magnums.) Before machines took over, bottles were all hand blown, and a trained glass blower had the lung capacity to blow one 750ml bottle in one breath. Once machines came about, it only made sense to standardize this measurement and take the bottle from “about 750ml” to exactly that.

To make sure we’re all on the same page, 1000ml = 100cl = 1.0L. These are generally the only ways you will see bottles labeled. Rarely does anyone use cl, but some EU regions like using 75cl instead of 750ml, so you may see it now and then.

I would list the key regions alphabetically, but honestly, do you really need a 9.0L bottle of Bordeaux? Probably not. However, a full case of Champagne being poured from one bottle is bad-ass.


Number of Glasses (Sparkling)* Number of Glasses (Still)** Capacity Champagne/Burgundy/Rhone Name Bordeaux Name Standard 750ml Bottle Equivalent
3 2.5 375ml Half Half 1/2 bottle
5.5 5 750ml Bottle Bottle 1 bottle (get the math here?)
12.5 10 1500ml Magnum Magnum 2 bottles
15 2250ml Marie-Jeanne (no longer made) 3 bottles
25 20 3000ml Jeroboam Double Magnum 4 bottles
38 30 4500ml Rehoboam Jeroboam*** 6 bottles
33.5 5000ml Jeroboam*** 6.6 bottles
50.5 40 6000ml Methuselah Imperiale 8 bottles
76 50.5 9000ml Salmanazar Salmanazar (rare) 12 bottles
101 81 12000ml Balthazar Double Imperiale 16 bottles
126.5 101 15000ml Nebuchadnezzar 20 bottles
152 121.5 18000ml Melchior 24 bottles

* Based on a 4oz glass for sparkling wine.
** Based on a 5oz glass for red/white wine.
*** Jeroboam in Bordeaux was 4500ml prior to 1978, and 5000ml after.

Yes, the French really do use these weird names.

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon
Enter your email for major launch updates:


2004 Havens Bourriquot

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009

91 / B+

Tasted by Mike Supple - 16 Jan 2009

Dark ruby core with a medium rim. Cola and black cherry aromas are surrounded by fresh new oak, all underscored by burnt charcoal and a hint of crushed violets. Smooth entry on the palate with ripe red and black cherries accented by sweet marjoram and other herbs. A touch of dark earth on the mid-palate gives way to spicy cedar on the finish.

70% Cabernet Franc, 30% Merlot.

Click here for full grades section

2006 Red Diamond Cabernet Sauvignon

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009

83 / B-

Tasted by Mike Supple - 06 Jan 2009

Purple core with a lighter rim. Smoke and gravel waft from the glass, supported by darker blueberry and cherry fruit. Black licorice candy on the palate with some juicy black cherry and a touch of earth. Thick on the mid-palate with a light tannic grip on the back end. Decent, but not particularly well balanced.

Click here for full grades section

2007 Los Vencejos Malbec

Monday, February 2nd, 2009

90 / A-

Tasted by Mike Supple - 21 Jan 2009

Inky purple core with a bright fuchsia rim. Dark boysenberry with blackberry notes on the nose, followed by a touch of mint, light toasty oak, nutmeg and cedar spice all surrounded by violets and crushed stone. Dark and thick on the palate with juicy blackberry, blueberry and crème de cassis flavors. Medium (+) acid with medium ripe/fine tannins. A touch of smoke, vanilla and baker’s chocolate join the dark fruit on the finish. Still very young and primary, but with enough fruit and structure to age. Drinks well now, and should go at least another 5 years.

Made from 100% Malbec. Aged for 15 months in new (65%) and second use French oak barrels. 1439 bottles produced.

Click here for full grades section

2006 Achaval Ferrer Malbec

Sunday, February 1st, 2009

88 / B

Tasted by Mike Supple - 13 May 2008

Dark core with a thin purple rim. Chocolate and caramel with light blackberry, flint and a faint earth and spicy herb aromas. Lush fruit on the palate entry with just a hint of spicy herbs. Good balancing acid with a rich, chocolaty finish.

Click here for full grades section